This is one in a series of notes for my class ITSF5001: Ethnography and Participant Observation.

given an issue

(say "many children have difficult times in school," "many of our colonial subjects have difficulties with what we ask them do")

 

if a plausible theory about this issue

(say, "children/primitives have difficulties with school/modernity because ...") and a body of research derived from that theory

 

then build on this theory

else question the grounds of the statement of the issue or the plausibility of the theory

 

if earlier research building on this theory leads to plausible new questions

(say, "children/primitives .... because .... psychological peculiarities")

else look for new questions

 

 

then derive some of these questions in the form of hypotheses

((say, "children .... because .... ADHD " or "certain races are less developed biologically")

 

imagine ways to justify this critique and alternative techniques

 

Hypothesis: Ritalin may alter rate of difficulties?

summary statement (possibly in the shape of a "question")

summary statement (possibly in the shape of a "question")

 

techniques for measuring

techniques not used before

techniques not used before

 

answer (not) confirming hypotheses

suggestions for questions to investigate in through hypothetico-deduction

relate the observations to the issue and restate the issue

 
(Most hypothetico-deductive research in the social sciences and psychology proceed in this manner) (this is the strict version of 'grounded theory') (this is classic Boasian anthropology, and ethnomethodology, now developed by Latour)