(based on James Mullooly's dissertation, 2003)
Both sequences have the overall shape of a QAE lesson as formalized by Mehan (1979). In both cases the students' responses are shaped as jokes (as formalized by Sacks 1974) without breaking the classroom frame--that is without the teacher breaking the progression of the class frame: it is as if the jokes had not happened. The class proceeded as if the students had been fully docile in performing what was specifically asked of them.
(further discussion and a more detailed transcript is also available)
Video Clip 1: "Up yours!"
|
Danielle
|
Gerardo
|
Christian
|
Victor
|
Edgar
|
| This means wait [Danielle's arm is outstretched with right palm facing students] this means respond [Danielle's right palm facing the ceiling] |
||||
| [arms moving across each other rapidly/glancing over at Christian] |
||||
| ["Up yours" gesture, i.e., while holding the left are horizontally in front of his chest, rapidly thrusting his right arm vertically upward, perpendicular to his left arm]. |
||||
|
[**** LAUGH ****]
|
||||
Note the absence of response to this possible breach
Video Clip 2: "Oui Oui"
The students have been told to answer "Yes" when the teacher's hand
moves down towards them.
|
Danielle
|
Gerardo
|
Christian
|
Victor
|
Edgar
|
|
Victor?
[switching from "wait" to "respond" hand gesture] |
||||
| Si | ||||
|
[ to Christian switching from "wait" to "respond"
hand gesture]
|
||||
| Si | ||||
|
[to Gerardo switching from "wait" to "respond"
hand gesture]
|
||||
| Oui, Oui | ||||
|
[**** LAUGH ****]
|
||||
| Yes | ||||
| OK | ||||
These are not instances student resistance or misunderstanding: