Required:
• Koyama, Jill Making failure pay: For-profit tutoring, high-stake testing, and public schools. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2010
on the School as cultural (arbitrary) constructed in an ongoing process form:
• All pedagogic action is,
• objectively,
• symbolic violence
• insofar as it is the imposition of a cultural arbitrary
• by an arbitrary power.
Bourdieu & Passeron ([1970] 1977: 5)
as long as one does not accept Bourdieu's hypothesis about "misknowing" and "habitus" while adding the ongoing work of imposition (and improvisation) to build particular schools
![]()
Where the School come from and how does it maintain itself?
note how Koyama does not rely on explanations of the ubiquity of an arbitrary
note how Koyama does not rely on explanations of the ubiquity of an arbitrary by invoking some "causality" (e.g. 'capitalism', 'neo-liberalism', etc.) or by assuming socialization or enculturation, or values, or an habitus somehow carried by individuals who "mis-know" their conditions. This is the major advance of Bourdieu allowed by the work of Bruno Latour (2005) who, building on Garfinkel (2002), emphasizes that everything human beings make has to be rebuilt in an ongoing fashion
Koyama and the search for the mechanisms of enforcement of the arbitrary through a determined focus on the acts of those who directly respond to the enforcement and, often, dissemble or resist.
methodological note:
Koyama did not stay in one place but followed indexes to a few nodes in a network with possibly no boundary. As such, Koyama cannot generalize to a population (though other forms of research allows us to propose the extent of the population in time and place)
"agency" (e.g. identity, self, etc.)
The local acting of the animation (from Koyama's ethnography)